Added: Nov 23, 2008
From: justclimb911
Duration: 10:27
The Crappy 757 strikes again.On October 2, 1996, shortly after takeoff just past midnight, the Boeing 757 airliner crew discovered that their basic flight instruments were behaving erratically and reported receiving contradictory serial emergency messages from the onboard computer, such as rudder ratio, overspeed, underspeed and flying too low. The crew declared an emergency and requested an immediate return to the airport. Faced with the lack of reliable basic flight instruments, constantly receiving contradictory warnings from the aircraft's flight computer (some of which were valid and some of which were not), and continuously believing that they were at a safe altitude, pilot Eric Schreiber and copilot David Fernández decided to cautiously begin the descent for the approach to the airport. Since the flight was at night over water, no visual references could be made to convey to the pilots their true altitude or aid the pilots in the descent. While the altimeter indicated an altitude of approximately 9,700 feet, the aircraft's true altitude was in fact much lower. It struck the water approximately twenty-five minutes after emergency declaration, making the pilots realize the true altitude of the airliner; for twenty seconds the pilots tried to make the airliner climb. The airliner then crashed into the water. All nine crew members and sixty-one passengers died.As a result of the blocked static ports the basic flight instruments relayed false airspeed, altitude and vertical speed data. Because the failure was not in any of the instruments but rather in a common supporting system, thereby defeating redundancy, the altimeter also relayed the false altitude information to the Air Traffic Controller, who was attempting to provide the pilots with basic flight data. This led to extreme confusion in the cockpit as the pilots were provided with some data (altitude) which seemed to correlate correctly with instrument data (altimeter) while the other data provided by ATC (approximate airspeed) did not agree. Although the pilots were quite cognizant of the possibility that all of the flight instruments were providing inaccurate data, the correlation between the altitude data given by ATC and that on the altimeter likely further compounded the confusion.On December 13, 1999, family members of the flight's passengers received one of the largest cash awards stemming from an airplane crash outside the United States aboard a non-U.S. carrier. According to the complaint, the control panel errors were caused by careless maintenance by Aeroperú and negligence and defective design by The Boeing Company, the aircraft's manufacturer. The suit was filed against Boeing in federal court in Miami in May, 1997. After extensive litigation the parties agreed to transfer the case against Boeing and Aeroperú to an international arbitration in Santiago, Chile, for a determination of the damages. The defendants agreed not to contest liability in Chile.CVR Transcriptions:http://www.avweb.com/other/peru603.html
Channel: Tech
Tags: 603 757 aeroperú american babe blonde boeing crap crappy crash flight horny hot mayday plane sexy slut xxx
Rating: 2.33 (3 ratings) Views: 688' favoriteCount='2 Comments: 6
oneworldguy Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - I also don't appreciate the title of this video. New technology is always difficult. The Boeing 757 (which has had an EXCELLENT safety record in terms of mechanical safety since in comparison with other aircraft types even outside of Boeing) was the first of its kind in terms of technology. Remember the Airbus 320 "lawnmower crash?" DC and MD were bought out by Boeing in much later years. Notice that DC 10 and MD 11 production are history now?
oneworldguy Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Even Airbus has major design flaws. They designed their tail/rudder so that the A300 could only be "efficiently" inspected by ultrasound technology. If you think for one second that American 587 (November 2001) was the fault of American Airlines or piloting, you are absolutely out of your mind. Certain parts of aircraft are supposed to be designed to break off in certain situations. The rudder is NOT one of them!
justclimb911 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Airbus A320/319/321 0.13 Airbus A330 0.00 Airbus A340 0.00Airbus A380 0.00Now choose your airplane to Fly...
justclimb911 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - I had TWO options:-Delete this as it constitutes a Blatant LIE coming from a Loser.-Offer you the opportunity to look like the Crying Loser that can´t admit that Boeing is just Crap.Official: AIRBUS has NEVER been found Legally responsible for just ONE single Comercial Plane Passenger´s LIVE.PD: In this Vid´s Info you have a perfect example of Boeing´s admitedly responsability. American 587 crash is a well know case of PILOT ERROR= Ur Tard
justclimb911 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - A LAWSUIT concerning Boeing was sent two weeks ago by the Families of Spanair´s MD-82 Crash 154 Victims, as the Spanish Gov has filtered that this plane was not properly configured for taking off and no sound alerts were heard on the Cockpit Voice Recordings, as the FAA had Recommended Boeing to change the FAULTY alert sytem after a same MD-82 crashed in Indiana back in 1987.Latest 3 Deadly Plane Crashes and 1 Common Factor: A Boeing 737= more than 200 people killed in just ONE MONTH.
justclimb911 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Another Boeing Crappy 737 jet has crashed near Russia's city of Perm, killing all 88 people on board."There were 88 people on board, 82 passengers and six crew; all of them died. There were no casualties on the ground."Boeing 727** 0.49Boeing 737 0.47***Boeing 747 0.76Boeing 757** 0.30Boeing 767 0.40Boeing 777 0.00Boeing DC9** 0.57Boeing DC10** 0.67Boeing MD11** 0.56Boeing MD80/MD90 0.26Boeing has a SERIOUS SAFETY "problem" indeed.